Vision & Sensors


  Home
  Subscribe
  eNewsletter
  Quality Magazine
  Online
  Industry Headlines
  eXtras
  Blogs
  Webinars
  Current Issue
  Calendar
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Products
  Resources
  V&S Source Book
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archive
  2010 Quality Plant of the Year
  2010 Quality Professional of the Year
  Industry Links
  Career Center
  Product Info (Free)
  Classified Ads
  Quality Showcases
  Quick Clicks
  Market Research
  Vision & Sensors Info
  Special Collections
  NDT Supplement
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Perspectives in Vision: On Minnesota Fats and Machine Vision
by John Nagle
February 23, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

John Nagle


Have you ever watched the performances of any of the truly great billiard players? It is pure artistry; the strategy, the angles, the spin…all the tricks of the trade under the precise guidance of deft and nimble hands. One of the greatest of all time was Minnesota Fats, and truly he was one of the most entertaining to watch.

Shot after shot would fall in rapid succession as Fats approached the table nonchalantly and, with barely a pause, let fly with his cue. Nearly every shot would look easy, and it left you thinking “Well gee, I could do that, it was straight in!” Few understand that a good pool player doesn’t just make hard shots; rather, a good pool player makes sure the next shot is easy. Therein lies the skill in billiards.

In our business as machine vision integrators, I’m very often approached by vision distributors and potential customers who will send us images of a product and ask “can you locate and inspect the [whatever] part in this picture?” And sometimes these images look like mud soup, with poor contrast, poor perspective and so on. Usually this happens after another integrator has given up on the problem and the customer is desperate.

Obviously vision algorithms and other math-intensive approaches are extremely important in machine vision integration; they can sometimes look like magic to the uninitiated, and can in many cases solve these very difficult challenges. But no amount of mathematical “voodoo” (as one of our customers calls it) will save you if the image is irreparably poor.

This goes far beyond choosing the right camera and lighting – it encompasses technique as well. 2-D or 3-D? Laser scatter? Dark field illumination? Some combination of these? The goal is always to generate contrast between the features you care about and the features you don’t. If you set up your shots correctly, just like Minnesota Fats, you too can win the game with relative ease.


John Nagle
John Nagle is the president of Nagle Research (Cedar Park, TX). For more information, e-mail jnagle@nagleresearch.com or visit www.nagleresearch.com.

|PrintEmail
  Comments (3)Post a Comment
Title: Great post


Excellent point John. Good machine vision engineers develop a way of thinking about an image so as to simplify the image processing task. Less skilled engineers aim to "do it in software."

http://machinevision4users.blogspot.com/


Title: Thanks


Thanks for the comment, I appreciate the feedback!


Title: Makes sense


John solving "hard applictions" making the customer think it was easy is something you do well


 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 





BNP Media